NETCONF meeting at IETF62 - Andy Bierman's notes
BEEP draft (to do)
- need to add examples
- hello message not completely documented
- SASL/TLS combination needs some clarification
- application protocol (terminology edits)
XSD cannot be used to completely validate NETCONF messages because
capabilities that are present on an agent will change the actual XML
accepted by the agent. XSD cannot express multiple variants of valid
XML instance documents based on these capabilities.
The WG needs to ask the XML Directorate to review the XML usage in
NETCONF.
There was a request to provide a non-secure transport for NETCONF.
Currently, security (e.g., encryption) is mandatory to implement but
optional to deploy for the user. There will not be any changes to
accommodate non-secure implementations of NETCONF.
SSH draft
SSH issue: what is the client is idle and holds a lock? Not an
issue -- this has been discussed before by the WG; the kill-session
operation can be used to break a lock.
PROT document issues
- need some examples in section 6 (filtering).
- need to validate the examples (again).
- need to clarify error code to return for lock operation
- LOCK_FAILED should be used instead of IN_USE
Presentation on NETMOD (see slides)
Discussion of NETCONF modeling and new features after official
meeting
- notifications (async messages in general) have been requested
by some people; still controversial; notion of non-notification
async messages (e.g., send accounting records ala IPFIX) is even
more controversial
- group decided individual I-Ds should be submitted which provide
well-thought-out solution proposals for notifications
2005/04/05 18:11:03
Simon Leinen <simon@switch.ch>