[dnsext] Re: draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 -- a more versatile proposal

[Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>]

On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 10:02:05PM +0100,
 Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de> wrote 
 a message of 71 lines which said:

> (e.g. TXT records together with PTR records on DNSBL lookups, mail
> policy TXT RRs together with MX RRs, etc.).

Or SPF and TXT together for SPF queries (RFC 4408, section 4.4).

> clearing of a bit would indicate lack of knowledge of the
> corresponding RRset and only be allowed only for cache servers, not
> for authorities.

Good idea and I specially like this clever detail (which addresses
Ohta's troll^H^H^H^H^Hremark).