[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-01.txt

To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, Doug Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-01.txt
From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:26:08 +0000
Cc: Alfred ï <ah@TR-Sys.de>, Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <200910282341.n9SNf0Jn042987@drugs.dv.isc.org>
References: <200910281344.OAA03343@TR-Sys.de> <4AE8A694.5010801@gmail.com> <200910282341.n9SNf0Jn042987@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Reply-to: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>



--On 29 October 2009 10:41:00 +1100 Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

Does anyone here really think that any proxy vendor, that doesn't
support TCP, could successfully argue that they did that analysis
and have the result pass a laugh test?


I'm not sure middlebox vendors much care about a namedroppers laugh test
or they wouldn't produce the proxy s/w they do.

--
Alex Bligh

References:
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-01.txt
  - From: Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-01.txt
  - From: Doug Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-01.txt
  - From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-01.txt
Next by Date: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-01.txt
Previous by thread: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-01.txt
Next by thread: [dnsext] new version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnskey-registry-fixes available
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread