Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-01.txt

[Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>]

> From: Alfred =?hp-roman8?B?SM5uZXM=?= <ah@TR-Sys.de>
> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:26:25 +0100 (MEZ)
> 
> "attempt to address"  !=  "achieve adherence"    :-)
> 
> It's still a long way to go.  Some folks need steadily repeated
> sermon until they are going to believe, isn't it?   :-)

"hello mr. middlebox vendor.  since we neglected to inform you that the
traffic you'll carry may include fragments and that you can't really 
predict maximum packet size based on the UDP port numbers on a packet,
we agree that it's perfectly reasonable that you totally fscked it up.
however, in an RFC you never heard of, we did finally get around to
asking that you rev your software to stop fscking up our traffic, so
could you please slot some engineering resources for it even though it
will not result in higher sales nor will failing to do it result in
lower sales?  thanks in advance!"