On 28 Oct 2009, at 12:14, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2009-10-27, at 13:10, João Damas wrote:Given this is an operational problem, I believe tweaking the protocol will never yield a perfect solution and that this sort of situation would see the users better served by crafting a BCP where, for instance, the choreography necessary for domain moves between registrars would be listed.This is very much an aside, but I continue to be mildly alarmed by the conflation of "registrar" with "zone manager" in this kind of discussion.
depends were the key-related info resides, and even on who holds the key. Although providing the DNS service is indeed not the same as being a registrar, I find it likely that the registrar, which currently keeps the list of NS, if any, will also keep the key-related info (e.g. DS to be sent to the parent). It is also possible there might be a third party dealing with the DNSSEC info, though it is hard to imagine how to fit that new entity into the customer-registrar- registry trio.
Joao