[dnsext] Separating DNAME-bis from whether to use DNAME at a given level

[Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>]

Dear colleagues,

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:57:42PM +0200, Alfred HÃnes wrote:

> Let me first discuss the more generic questions underlying the
> 'variant' domain (TLD or other) draft and discussion.

[. . .]

> Back from the 'variant' domain arguments to the protocol specification
> undergoing revision (I-D.dnsext-rfc2782bis-dname):

I'd like to keep these two topics distinct, please.  The legal and
political (in the broad sense, like "policy") ramifications of using
DNAME are not really on-topic for DNSEXT, so let's try to separate the
two discussions.

Thanks,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.