[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Protocol numbers for RSA/SHA{256|512} (Was: Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC, implementations?)
- To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Protocol numbers for RSA/SHA{256|512} (Was: Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC, implementations?)
- From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:16:59 -0700
- Openpgp: id=D5B2F0FB
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:40:21PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> IANA could kill two birds with one stone by not assigning 8-11 "in the
>> foreseeable future" and assigning something totally different to
>> RSA/SHA{256|512}.
>
> Actually, in consultation with IANA, we've determined that we'll
> assign the identifiers in the 8-11 range
I see based on
http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-sec-alg-numbers/dns-sec-alg-numbers.xhtml
that the decision to use the numbers that were already shipped seems
to have been finalized.