[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dnsext] What is the 'canonical' spelling: RRset of RRSet ?

To: Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] What is the 'canonical' spelling: RRset of RRSet ?
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:35:46 +0200
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200910151401.QAA27159@TR-Sys.de>
References: <200910151401.QAA27159@TR-Sys.de>

Alfred,

    Folks,
    I need a bit of feedback for a review.

Thanks for bringing this up.
    
    What is the correct/preferred spelling/capitalization from the PoV
    of the list:  "RRset"  or  "RRSet"  ?
    
    Any opinions?

My preference is for RRset because that is what I always use.

	jaap

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [dnsext] What is the 'canonical' spelling: RRset of RRSet ?
  - From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>

References:
- [dnsext] What is the 'canonical' spelling: RRset of RRSet ?
  - From: Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [dnsext] What is the 'canonical' spelling: RRset of RRSet ?
Next by Date: Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward
Previous by thread: Re: [dnsext] What is the 'canonical' spelling: RRset of RRSet ?
Next by thread: Re: [dnsext] What is the 'canonical' spelling: RRset of RRSet ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread