Mail Thread Index
- [dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 -- a more versatile proposal,
Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] Re:conclusions drawn in draft-wang-dns-inconsis-ncache-00,
Zheng Wang
- [dnsext] DNSEXT Working Group status report from Chairs,
Andrew Sullivan
- [dnsext] Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol,
Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] New unofficial versions of drafts,
Rose, Scott W.
- [dnsext] IETF 76: Root DNSSEC Presentation with Q&A,
Jakob Schlyter
- [dnsext] conclusions drawn in draft-wang-dns-inconsis-ncache-00,
Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-01,
Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnskey-registry-fixes-01 editorials,
Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] A few notes on the IXFR-ONLY draft,
Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] WGLC: Gost algorithms for DNSSEC,
Olafur Gudmundsson/DNSEXT chair
- [dnsext] Draft agenda posted,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- [dnsext] RFC 5702 on Use of SHA-2 Algorithms with RSA in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSEC,
rfc-editor
- [dnsext] new version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnskey-registry-fixes available,
Rose, Scott W.
- [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- [dnsext] Trust Anchors,
Bob Halley
- Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors,
João Damas
- registrar transfers (was Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors),
Joe Abley
- [dnsext] Re: registrar transfers,
Jim Reid
- Re: registrar transfers (was Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors),
João Damas
- Re: registrar transfers (was Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors),
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Trust Anchors,
Bob Halley
- [dnsext] Re: Is rfc3110 correct?,
Mark Andrews
- [dnsext] Is rfc3110 correct?,
Mark Andrews
- [dnsext] A64-DNS Resource Record for IPv4-mapped IPv6 Address,
mohamed.boucadair
- Protocol numbers for RSA/SHA{256|512} (Was: Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC, implementations?),
Doug Barton
- [dnsext] Re: DNAME-bis issues (was: [DNSOP] new draft about idn tld variant implementation),
Chris Thompson
- [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- [dnsext] Re: [DNSOP] new draft about idn tld variants implementation,
Chris Thompson
- [dnsext] planning draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-17 to IESG,
Andrew Sullivan
- [dnsext] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dns-recursive-discovery-00,
Ray . Bellis
- [dnsext] What is the 'canonical' spelling: RRset of RRSet ?,
Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-04 editorials,
Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] Significant typo (I hope) in draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-00,
Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] FW: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-04,
Rose, Scott W.
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Doug Otis
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Doug Otis
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Doug Otis
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Doug Otis
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Ray . Bellis
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00 / a way forward,
Doug Otis
- [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- [dnsext] Re: draft-iab-idn-encoding-00,
Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dnsext] Why ZSK rollover is a Bad Idea,
Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00,
Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] Why ZSK rollover is a Bad Idea (tm),
Nicholas Weaver
- [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00.txt,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00.txt,
George Barwood
[dnsext] DNSEXT session at IETF 76,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] RSA/SHA256 assignments,
Olafur Gudmundsson/DNSEXT chair
[dnsext] Protocol Action: 'Use of SHA-2 algorithms with RSA in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSEC' to Proposed Standard,
The IESG
[dnsext] IETF-75 Hiroshima agenda requests and deadlines,
Olafur Gudmundsson
[dnsext] comment about the IANA registry discussion in draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-allocation,
Rose, Scott W.
[dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0,
George Barwood
[dnsext] Collection of recursive resolvers?,
Nicholas Weaver
Re: [dnsext] draft-barwood-dnsext-dns-transport-signal-00 to WG work item,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] draft-barwood-dnsext-dns-transport-signal-00.txt - WG item,
George Barwood
Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Jeffrey A. Williams
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-17.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] Two more details in draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc3597-bis-00,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc3597-bis-00,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] Protocol standards and implementations vs. configurations,
Matthew Dempsky
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc3597-bis-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] re: Nominum doing something DNSCurve-y?,
=JeffH
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg-allocation-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg-allocation-00,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] draft-hoffman-dnssec-* (DNSSEC algorithm drafts),
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-16 follow-up,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] draft-barwood-dnsext-dns-transport-04 technical comments,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] Re-ordering of responses over TCP,
George Barwood
[dnsext] draft-dolmatov-dnsext-dnssec-gost-01 technical & editorial issues,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] [mary.barnes@nortel.com: Nomcom 2009-10: FINAL Call for Nominations, Local Office hours, Nominee Questionnaires],
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] WG Action: RECHARTER: DNS Extensions Working group (dnsext),
IESG Secretary
Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Jelte Jansen
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Basil Dolmatov
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Jelte Jansen
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Basil Dolmatov
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
John Schnizlein
- [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
David Blacka
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] algorithm identifier code point hijacking,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Paul Hoffman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [dnsext] GOST DNSSEC implementations?,
Olaf Kolkman
Re: [dnsext] DNS transport,
Douglas Otis
[dnsext] Nominum doing something DNSCurve-y?,
Matthew Dempsky
[no subject],
Unknown
[no subject],
Unknown
[dnsext] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256 (Use of SHA-2 algorithms with RSA in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSEC) to Proposed Standard,
The IESG
[no subject],
Unknown
[dnsext] Afiliation of DNSEXT WG chairs,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
Doug Otis
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Amplification attacks, RFC3704 etc.,
George Barwood
[dnsext] Sorry for the redundant emails,
Eric Osterweil
Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Jeffrey A. Williams
[dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Alan Clegg
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Alan Clegg
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Alan Clegg
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
João Damas
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] Presentation on DNSSEC that Google brought to my attention,
Paul Wouters
Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Jeffrey A. Williams
[dnsext] draft-hoffman-dnssec-alg-allocation,
Jim Reid
S weak in the upper story ju,
Carriere
[dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dempsky-dnscurve-00,
Matthew Dempsky
[dnsext] Editor needed,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Florian Weimer
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Florian Weimer
- [dnsext] Re: Editor needed,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [dnsext] Re: Editor needed,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Paul Vixie
- [dnsext] TCP and 512+ byte responses,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] TCP and 512+ byte responses,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Donald Eastlake
- Where TCP might be required (Was: [dnsext] Editor needed),
Paul Hoffman
- Message not available
- Re: Where TCP might be required (Was: [dnsext] Editor needed),
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Alex Bligh
- Historical insanity (ignorable) Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
David Conrad
- Re: Historical insanity (ignorable) Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Mans Nilsson
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
George Barwood
- [dnsext] making TCP a MUST,
Jim Reid
- [dnsext] Re: making TCP a MUST,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Re: making TCP a MUST,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] Re: making TCP a MUST,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Re: making TCP a MUST,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Re: making TCP a MUST,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: making TCP a MUST,
George Barwood
- [dnsext] gethostbyname(),
Jim Reid
- [dnsext] Re: gethostbyname(),
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Re: making TCP a MUST,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Re: making TCP a MUST,
Ray . Bellis
- [dnsext] Re: making TCP a MUST,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: making TCP a MUST,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] Re: making TCP a MUST,
bmanning
- [dnsext] new DNS transports,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] new DNS transports,
bmanning
- [dnsext] prioritising TCP and UDP queries,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] new DNS transports,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] making TCP a MUST,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Alex Bligh
Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Ray . Bellis
Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Alex Bligh
Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Mark Andrews
Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
George Barwood
Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
George Barwood
Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Paul Vixie
- RE: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Aki Tuomi
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed (adopted alternative transport),
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- [dnsext] irrelevant Subject: header,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] irrelevant Subject: header,
Shane Kerr
- Re: [dnsext] irrelevant Subject: header,
bert hubert
- [dnsext] Re: irrelevant Subject: header,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
Mark Andrews
- [dnsext] Another reason for TCP MUST,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Editor needed,
bmanning
[dnsext] Minutes from IETF-75 uploaded,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Olafur Gudmundsson/DNSEXT chair
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Wayne Beaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
bmanning
- RE: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Aki Tuomi
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Doug Barton
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Duane Wessels
Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Eric Osterweil
Re: [dnsext] EDNS0 fallback "revisited",
Eric Osterweil
[dnsext] Working around proxies,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] Working around proxies,
Florian Weimer
[dnsext] NAPTR vs (S-NAPTR & U-NAPTR),
sandoche BALAKRICHENAN
[dnsext] BCP 152, RFC 5625 on DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines,
rfc-editor
[dnsext] TCP DNS benchmarking, or Who's afraid of TCP?,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] TCP DNS benchmarking, or Who's afraid of TCP?,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] TCP DNS benchmarking, or Who's afraid of TCP?,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] TCP DNS benchmarking, or Who's afraid of TCP?,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] TCP DNS benchmarking, or Who's afraid of TCP?,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] TCP DNS benchmarking, or Who's afraid of TCP?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] TCP DNS benchmarking, or Who's afraid of TCP?,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] TCP DNS benchmarking, or Who's afraid of TCP?,
Paul Vixie
[dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Basil Dolmatov
- RE: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Dan Simon
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Andrew Sullivan
- RE: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Dan Simon
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Nicholas Weaver
- Message not available
- RE: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Paul Hoffman
- RE: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Dan Simon
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Andrew Sullivan
- RE: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Dan Simon
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- Message not available
- RE: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Paul Hoffman
Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Basil Dolmatov
Message not available
- RE: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Basil Dolmatov
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Paul Hoffman
- [dnsext] Updated: Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Updated: Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] Updated: Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Basil Dolmatov
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] Updated: Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] Updated: Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Rose, Scott W.
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Basil Dolmatov
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Andrew Sullivan
- RE: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Dan Simon
- [dnsext] Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Basil Dolmatov
Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Jelte Jansen
Re: [dnsext] Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
[dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Chris Thompson
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
Douglas Otis
- [dnsext] measuring TCP query performance,
Jim Reid
- [dnsext] Re: measuring TCP query performance,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] root DNSKEY response is 1749 bytes,
William Allen Simpson
- [dnsext] TCP traffic and DNSSEC,
Jim Reid
[dnsext] Suggested fallbacks...,
Nicholas Weaver
[dnsext] DNS over SCTP and correcting security concerns,
Douglas Otis
Re: [dnsext] all .gov do=1 nxdomain answers already appear to be fragmented.. and it works somehow,
Mark Andrews
[dnsext] Re: What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Stefan Winter
[dnsext] all .gov do=1 nxdomain answers already appear to be fragmented.. and it works somehow,
bert hubert
[dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
Doug Otis
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft updated,
George Barwood
[dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Paul Hoffman
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Paul Hoffman
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Doug Otis
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Alex Bligh
Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Alex Bligh
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [dnsext] What ELSE relies on UDP fragmentation?,
Nicholas Weaver
[dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Size of DNSsec NXDOMAIN response,
Florian Weimer
[dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Robert Elz
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Duane Wessels
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option draft,
Paul Vixie
[dnsext] Fragmentation undesirable,
George Barwood
Re: [dnsext] middleboxes and an alternate port number,
William Allen Simpson
[dnsext] experimental/testing DNSSEC algorithm identifiers,
Jelte Jansen
[dnsext] extending the EDNS Algorithm Understood (AU) option,
William Allen Simpson
[dnsext] Rethinking the security too large for UDP problem,
William Allen Simpson
[dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
Doug Otis
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
Doug Otis
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
Doug Otis
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 2, practice,
bert hubert
[dnsext] NSEC3 confusion (in .org),
bert hubert
[dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Doug Otis
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Paul Vixie
- [dnsext] Soft Packet Size Limit (was: DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory),
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] Soft Packet Size Limit (was: DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory),
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] Soft Packet Size Limit,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Ray . Bellis
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Michael Richardson
- [dnsext] middleboxes and an alternate port number,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] middleboxes and an alternate port number,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Tony Finch
Re: [dnsext] DNS over SCTP problems, part 1, theory,
Doug Otis
[dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 by Sep 1st,
William Allen Simpson
[dnsext] SCTP trials on NANOG, 3 of 3 (Re: DNS hardening),
Paul Vixie
[dnsext] SCTP trials over on NANOG, 2 of 3 (Re: DNS hardening),
Paul Vixie
[dnsext] Re: DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky,
Paul Vixie
[dnsext] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-dolmatov-cryptocom-gost2814789-01.txt],
Basil Dolmatov
[dnsext] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-dolmatov-dnsext-dnssec-gost-01.txt],
Basil Dolmatov
[dnsext] Trying to reading RFC 4035 as a requirements document,
Edward Lewis
[dnsext] dnssec-bis updates: key use,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
[dnsext] Publication request for draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-14.txt,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] Issue with RFC 4034, section 3 and section 4,
Edward Lewis
[dnsext] Re: draft-kerr-ixfr-only-00.txt,
Mark Andrews
[dnsext] draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03 -- more time please!,
Patrik Fältström
[dnsext] Additions to the draft charter,
Olafur Gudmundsson/DNSEXT chair
[dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Rob Austein
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Rose, Scott W.
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Michael Richardson
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Joe Abley
- [dnsext] operational impact of signed responses/referrals,
Jim Reid
- [dnsext] Re: operational impact of signed responses/referrals,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] operational impact of signed responses/referrals,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Michael Richardson
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
William Allen Simpson
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Basil Dolmatov
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Frederico A C Neves
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Jelte Jansen
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Francis Dupont
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Doug Otis
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
John Schnizlein
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
John Schnizlein
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Jelte Jansen
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Paul Hoffman
- RE: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Aki Tuomi
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Samuel Weiler
Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Frederico A C Neves
Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Nicholas Weaver
Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Mans Nilsson
Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Paul Hoffman
Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Samuel Weiler
Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Olaf Kolkman
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [dnsext] Signing the root with SHA-1 or SHA-2,
Roy Arends
[dnsext] DNS64 and lying cache servers,
Francis Dupont
[dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 comments,
Michael Graff
[dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Niall O'Reilly
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Douglas Otis
- [dnsext] Re: comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Anand Buddhdev
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Bob Halley
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Eric Osterweil
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Douglas Otis
- edns fallback (was Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-...),
Paul Vixie
- Re: edns fallback (was Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-...),
Eric Osterweil
- Re: edns fallback (was Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-...),
Douglas Otis
- Re: edns fallback (was Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-...),
Paul Vixie
- Re: edns fallback (was Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-...),
Mark Andrews
- Re: edns fallback (was Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-...),
Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] comments on draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-03,
Paul Vixie
[dnsext] Report from the Chairs,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-02.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] agenda updated,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] Materials for any talking,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] some NSEC confusion on cname wildcards,
bert hubert
[dnsext] Meeting agenda updated; please send materials,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] WikiNameDroppers?,
William Allen Simpson
[dnsext] TALINK RRTYPE review. Start of three week comment period,
roy
[dnsext] DNSEXT agenda updated,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] Notes on the DNS standard,
George Barwood
[dnsext] draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00,
Andreas Gustafsson
[dnsext] Request for clarification on Truncation,
George Barwood
[dnsext] 1st version of agenda for IETF75,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] dnssec-bis-updates question #1,
David Blacka
[dnsext] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-huang-dnsext-reputation-00.txt,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
[dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 and compatibility with the installed base,
Jim Reid
[dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
IESG Secretary
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Shane Kerr
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Shane Kerr
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Jelte Jansen
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Roy Arends
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
João Damas
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext),
Olafur Gudmundsson
[dnsext] -03 version of algo-signal posted,
Rose, Scott W.
[dnsext] I-D: IXFR-ONLY proposal (Was: New Version Notification for draft-kerr-ixfr-only-00),
OndÅej SurÃ
[dnsext] EDNS0 OWNER Option,
Stuart Cheshire
[dnsext] Protocol Action: 'DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines' to BCP,
The IESG
[dnsext] Re: I-D Action:draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6-00.txt,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
[dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Message not available
- [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Chris Hills
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Michael Graff
- [dnsext] fragmentation considered harmful,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] fragmentation considered harmful,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] fragmentation considered harmful,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] fragmentation considered harmful,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] fragmentation considered harmful,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] fragmentation considered harmful,
Diane Bruce
- Re: [dnsext] fragmentation considered harmful,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] fragmentation considered harmful,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Douglas Otis
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- [dnsext] Re: Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [dnsext] Re: Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- RE: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Antoin Verschuren
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
Paul Vixie
Re: [dnsext] Name server agility with DNSSEC,
George Barwood
[dnsext] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-behave-dns64-00.txt],
marcelo bagnulo braun
[dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
Steve Crocker
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] algo-signal -03 -- Internet Draft to facilitate algorithm transition,
bmanning
[dnsext] RFC5011 interoperabilty testing,
Steve Crocker
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-06.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Clarification on RFC 2181,
Olafur Gudmundsson
[dnsext] Response to request for real data...,
Nicholas Weaver
[dnsext] updated dname update draft (-16),
W.C.A. Wijngaards
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-16.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] ops.ietf.org Blacklisting Complications,
Sabahattin Gucukoglu
[dnsext] Glue Caching Misbehaviours,
Sabahattin Gucukoglu
[dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Matt Larson
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Nested trust anchors (again),
Michael StJohns
- [dnsext] Re: Nested trust anchors (again),
Stephane Bortzmeyer
[dnsext] DNS Extensions Working Group meeting at IETF 75,
Andrew Sullivan
Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
bmanning
[dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Francis Dupont
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Francis Dupont
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Matt Larson
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Mark Andrews
- Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Matt Larson
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
bert hubert
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Alex Bligh
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
bert hubert
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
bmanning
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Ray . Bellis
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Alex Bligh
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Ray . Bellis
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Paul Vixie
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Mark Andrews
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
bmanning
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Alex Bligh
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Paul Vixie
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Doug Otis
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Paul Vixie
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Mark Andrews
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
bmanning
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
George Barwood
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Mark Andrews
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
George Barwood
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Tony Finch
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Alex Bligh
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Mark Andrews
- Re: Real data (was Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck),
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Paul Vixie
- [dnsext] Re: Danger of coming unstuck,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [dnsext] Re: Danger of coming unstuck,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Danger of coming unstuck,
bert hubert
- [dnsext] Re: Danger of coming unstuck,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
sthaug
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
sthaug
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Danger of coming unstuck,
Francis Dupont
[dnsext] Why the cause of drops matter...,
Nicholas Weaver
[dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Matt Larson
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Mark Andrews
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Michael Graff
Re: [dnsext] EDNS Page Option to handle large responses,
Michael Graff
[dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Peter Koch
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Andrew Sullivan
- [dnsext] Does RFC 3226 require DO=1 ==> bufsize over 1219? was Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Edward Lewis
- [dnsext] Re: Does RFC 3226 require DO=1 ==> bufsize over 1219? was Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Does RFC 3226 require DO=1 ==> bufsize over 1219? was Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Does RFC 3226 require DO=1 ==> bufsize over 1219? was Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Does RFC 3226 require DO=1 ==> bufsize over 1219? was Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Does RFC 3226 require DO=1 ==> bufsize over 1219? was Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Does RFC 3226 require DO=1 ==> bufsize over 1219? was Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Does RFC 3226 require DO=1 ==> bufsize over 1219? was Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
bmanning
- [dnsext] On RFC maintenance and reference implementations (was: Does RFC 3226. . .),
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] On RFC maintenance and reference implementations (was: Does RFC 3226. . .),
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] On RFC maintenance and reference implementations (was: Does RFC 3226. . .),
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] On RFC maintenance and reference implementations,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] On RFC maintenance and reference implementations (was: Does RFC 3226. . .),
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] On RFC maintenance and reference implementations (was: Does RFC 3226. . .),
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] On RFC maintenance and reference implementations (was: Does RFC 3226. . .),
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] On RFC maintenance and reference implementations (was: Does RFC 3226. . .),
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Peter Koch
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] TCP pushback,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit,
George Barwood
[dnsext] Hardening DNS using existing protocol elements,
George Barwood
[dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Michael Sinatra
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Paul Hoffman
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Danny Mayer
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Danny Mayer
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Ask Bjørn Hansen
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Preferring IPv4 glue over IPv6 glue for IPv4 clients,
bmanning
[dnsext] The ICSI Netalyzr,
Nicholas Weaver
[dnsext] Proposal to make DNSSEC Algorithm Types be "RFC required",
Paul Hoffman
[dnsext] Distributing the root zone out of band,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Distributing the root zone out of band,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Distributing the root zone out of band,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Distributing the root zone out of band,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Distributing the root zone out of band,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Distributing the root zone out of band,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Distributing the root zone out of band,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Distributing the root zone out of band,
David Conrad
- [dnsext] TCP queries to the root servers,
Jim Reid
- [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
bmanning
- TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Shane Kerr
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
bmanning
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
bert hubert
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
bmanning
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
bert hubert
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
bmanning
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
David Conrad
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
David Conrad
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
bmanning
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
David Conrad
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Ask Bjørn Hansen
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
bmanning
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Ask Bjørn Hansen
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Florian Weimer
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
bmanning
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Paul Vixie
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: TCP performance, was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Niall O'Reilly
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Shane Kerr
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Paul Vixie
- RFC 3226 violations (was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers),
David Conrad
- [dnsext] Re: RFC 3226 violations,
Jim Reid
- Re: RFC 3226 violations (was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers),
Paul Vixie
- Re: RFC 3226 violations (was Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers),
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Matthew Dempsky
- SCTP (Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers ),
Paul Vixie
- Re: SCTP (Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers ),
bert hubert
- SCTP (Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers ),
bert hubert
- Re: SCTP (Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers ),
Shane Kerr
- Re: SCTP (Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers ),
Doug Otis
- Re: SCTP (Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers ),
Florian Weimer
- Re: SCTP (Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers ),
Douglas Otis
- [dnsext] Comparing SCTP to TCP or UDP,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] Comparing SCTP to TCP or UDP,
Niels Bakker
- Re: [dnsext] Comparing SCTP to TCP or UDP,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Danny Mayer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] Re: TCP queries to the root servers,
Matt Larson
[dnsext] Signing a zone and record,
Aki Tuomi
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-14.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Matt Larson
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Paul Vixie
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Enforcing correct behavior: EDNS0 OK bit set, buffer < 1024,
Olafur Gudmundsson
[dnsext] IP fragmentation security,
George Barwood
[dnsext] EDNS Ping fallbacks,
George Barwood
[dnsext] EDNS clarification,
George Barwood
Re: [dnsext] DNSCurve,
Matthew Dempsky
[dnsext] Draft DNSEXT charter,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
[dnsext] [dotis@mail-abuse.org: Re: DNS over SCTP],
Stephane Bortzmeyer
[dnsext] DNSEXT to meet at IETF-75/Stockholm,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
[dnsext] Selecting which name server IP address to query,
Matthew Dempsky
[dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Emilio Perea
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Mark Andrews
- [dnsext] Re: Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
SM
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
sthaug
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Basil Dolmatov
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
sthaug
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Edward Lewis
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Emilio Perea
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Mark Andrews
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Edward Lewis
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Question on RFC 3225 - DO Bit and ANY,
Matthew Dempsky
Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCurve,
Matthew Dempsky
Re: [Namedroppers-honest] [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Jeffrey A. Williams
VS: Re: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Aki Tuomi
[dnsext] DNAME update draft UD bit,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
[dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Paul Hoffman
- RE: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Aki Tuomi
- RE: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Edward Lewis
- RE: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
- Re: [dnsext] Increasing hash collision resilience,
Jeffrey A. Williams
dropping request for adoption of EDNS-PING, was Re: [dnsext] Point of order,
bert hubert
- Re: dropping request for adoption of EDNS-PING, was Re: [dnsext] Point of order,
Bart Smit
- Re: dropping request for adoption of EDNS-PING, was Re: [dnsext] Point of order,
bmanning
- Re: dropping request for adoption of EDNS-PING, was Re: [dnsext] Point of order,
Andrew Sullivan
- Message not available
- Re: dropping request for adoption of EDNS-PING, was Re: [dnsext] Point of order,
Federico Lucifredi
- [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Federico Lucifredi
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: dropping request for adoption of EDNS-PING, was Re: [dnsext] Point of order,
Matthew Dempsky
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Paul Hoffman
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- [dnsext] Security of the DNS, holistic approach (Was: DNSCURVE,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: [dnsext] Security of the DNS, holistic approach (Was: DNSCURVE,
Aki Tuomi
- Re: [dnsext] Security of the DNS, holistic approach (Was: DNSCURVE,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Security of the DNS, holistic approach (Was: DNSCURVE,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Security of the DNS, holistic approach (Was: DNSCURVE,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Security of the DNS, holistic approach (Was: DNSCURVE,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Security of the DNS, holistic approach (Was: DNSCURVE,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Security of the DNS, holistic approach (Was: DNSCURVE,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Security of the DNS, holistic approach (Was: DNSCURVE,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Security of the DNS, holistic approach (Was: DNSCURVE,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Security of the DNS, holistic approach (Was: DNSCURVE,
Basil Dolmatov
- [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Federico Lucifredi
- [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNSCURVE,
Basil Dolmatov
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Michael StJohns
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Adoption criteria, was Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Adoption criteria, was Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] DNSCURVE,
Florian Weimer
[dnsext] Allocation of EDNS0 option codes (Was: dropping request for adoption of EDNS-PING,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: dropping request for adoption of EDNS-PING, was Re: [dnsext] Point of order,
Paul Hoffman
[dnsext] Adopting GOST digital signature algorithm document,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
[dnsext] TSIG, TKEY, and IPSEC,
Edward Lewis
[dnsext] Point of order,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
[dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Bart Smit
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Encouragement of debate (was: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING),
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Matthew Dempsky
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Support for EDSN0 PING,
Paul Vixie
[dnsext] signing referral NSs and glue,
Edward Lewis
[dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Bert
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Matt Larson
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Roy Arends
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Stefan Schmidt
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Florian Weimer
- Desperate plea for 0x20, was Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Shane Kerr
- Re: Desperate plea for 0x20, was Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience andmeeting in Stockholm,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: Desperate plea for 0x20, was Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Desperate plea for 0x20, was Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Florian Weimer
- RE: Desperate plea for 0x20, was Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Antoin Verschuren
- Re: Desperate plea for 0x20, was Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Federico Lucifredi
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Shane Kerr
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Florian Weimer
- RE: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Antoin Verschuren
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Otmar Lendl
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
- Re: [dnsext] Forgery resilience and meeting in Stockholm,
Peter Koch
[dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Scott Rose
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
- was Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Shane Kerr
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Shane Kerr
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Francis Dupont
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Federico Lucifredi
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Francis Dupont
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Andras Salamon
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Scott Rose
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Federico Lucifredi
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Federico Lucifredi
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Francis Dupont
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Federico Lucifredi
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Federico Lucifredi
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC TSIG MD5 Deprecated,
Francis Dupont
[dnsext] new version of tsig-md5-deprecated I-D available,
Francis Dupont
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-tsig-md5-deprecated-03.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] Domain "Flag" to indicate (non-)availability of automatic DNS updates for reverse DNS,
Jeroen Massar
[dnsext] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy (DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines) to BCP,
The IESG
[dnsext] SEP bit,
John Dickinson
[dnsext] DNSEXT WG document status,
Olafur Gudmundsson
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-tsig-md5-deprecated-02.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-13.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] Document Advancement: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-05.txt,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
[dnsext] we need an IAB statement on Secure DNS,
Paul Vixie
RE: [dnsext] we need an IAB statement on Secure DNS,
Aki Tuomi
Re: [dnsext] we need an IAB statement on Secure DNS,
Masataka Ohta
Re: [dnsext] we need an IAB statement on Secure DNS,
Thierry Moreau
<Possible follow-ups>
RE: [dnsext] we need an IAB statement on Secure DNS,
jmiller
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-05.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] Thinking about a DNSSEC api...,
Nicholas Weaver
[dnsext] "Network bit order" in RFC 3845,
Stuart Cheshire
[dnsext] Fwd: [Cfrg] DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94,
Olafur Gudmundsson
[dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Otmar Lendl
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Otmar Lendl
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Andrew Sullivan
- [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Aki Tuomi
- [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Andreas Gustafsson
- RE: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Aki Tuomi
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
bert hubert
- RE: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Antoin Verschuren
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Otmar Lendl
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Stefan Schmidt
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Nicholas Weaver
- Publishing NS features in the DNS, was Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Shane Kerr
- RE: Publishing NS features in the DNS, was Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Aki Tuomi
- Re: Publishing NS features in the DNS, was Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Shane Kerr
- RE: Publishing NS features in the DNS, was Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Aki Tuomi
- Re: Publishing NS features in the DNS, was Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Shane Kerr
- Re: Publishing NS features in the DNS, was Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: Publishing NS features in the DNS, was Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Shane Kerr
- Re: Publishing NS features in the DNS, was Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Florian Weimer
- Re: Publishing NS features in the DNS, was Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Shane Kerr
- Re: Publishing NS features in the DNS, was Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Florian Weimer
- Re: Publishing NS features in the DNS, was Re: [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Niels Bakker
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Francis Dupont
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Peter Koch
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Niels Bakker
- Re: [dnsext] Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Andrew Sullivan
- [dnsext] Re: Adopt EDNS0 Ping, benefits vs disadvantages ?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
[dnsext] NSEC for preemptive assertion of nonexistence,
Stuart Cheshire
[dnsext] Request for adoption of draft-hubert-ulevitch-edns-ping.txt as a working group document,
bert hubert
[dnsext] Contradictions in NSEC3 wording in draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256,
Paul Hoffman
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-04.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] WGLC summary: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
[dnsext] New RRTYPE assignment request: SSLFP RRTYPE Request,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dolmatov-dnsext-dnssec-gost-00.txt,
Paul Hoffman
[dnsext] New draft has been posted,
Basil Dolmatov
- [dnsext] Re: New draft has been posted,
Basil Dolmatov
- Request for adoption (was: [dnsext] New draft has been posted),
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Request for adoption (was: [dnsext] New draft has been posted),
Peter Koch
- Message not available
- Message not available
- RE: Request for adoption (was: [dnsext] New draft has been posted),
Edward Lewis
- RE: Request for adoption (was: [dnsext] New draft has been posted),
Dan Simon
- Re: Request for adoption (was: [dnsext] New draft has been posted),
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: Request for adoption (was: [dnsext] New draft has been posted),
Jeffrey A. Williams
- [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption,
Michael Graff
- [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption,
OndÅej SurÃ
- [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption,
Michael Graff
- [dnsext] handshakes and bigger QueryIDs,
Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption,
Tony Finch
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Paul Vixie
- [dnsext] Re: EDNS ping mechanisms,
Florian Weimer
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
George Barwood
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Paul Vixie
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
bert hubert
- Message not available
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Paul Vixie
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
bert hubert
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Paul Vixie
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Paul Vixie
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
bert hubert
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Francis Dupont
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
bert hubert
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Edward Lewis
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Edward Lewis
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Francis Dupont
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Tony Finch
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Edward Lewis
- [dnsext] Re: EDNS ping mechanisms,
Florian Weimer
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
bmanning
- Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption ),
Paul Vixie
Securing hop by hop (was Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption)),
Shane Kerr
RE: Securing hop by hop (was Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption)),
Aki Tuomi
[dnsext] Re: Securing hop by hop (was Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption)),
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [dnsext] Re: Securing hop by hop (was Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption)),
Matthew Dempsky
Re: [dnsext] Re: Securing hop by hop (was Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption)),
Basil Dolmatov
Re: [dnsext] Re: Securing hop by hop,
Florian Weimer
Re: [dnsext] Re: Securing hop by hop,
bert hubert
Re: [dnsext] Re: Securing hop by hop,
Edward Lewis
[dnsext] Re: Securing hop by hop (was Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption)),
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [dnsext] Re: Securing hop by hop (was Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption)),
Basil Dolmatov
Re: [dnsext] Re: Securing hop by hop (was Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption)),
Nicholas Weaver
Re: Securing hop by hop (was Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption)),
Shane Kerr
Re: Securing hop by hop (was Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext]Re: Request for adoption)),
Jeffrey A. Williams
Re: Securing hop by hop (was Re: EDNS ping mechanisms (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption)),
Tony Finch
Re: [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption,
Paul Vixie
Re: [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption,
Michael Graff
Re: [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption,
Paul Vixie
Re: [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption,
Jeffrey A. Williams
DNSSEC-aware applications (was [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption),
Danny Mayer
Re: [dnsext] Re: Request for adoption,
Ted Lemon
[dnsext] Bigger QueryIDs,
Jim Reid
Re: [dnsext] Bigger QueryIDs,
Nicholas Weaver
Re: [dnsext] Bigger QueryIDs,
Jim Reid
Re: [dnsext] Bigger QueryIDs,
Alex Bligh
Re: [dnsext] Bigger QueryIDs,
Nicholas Weaver
Re: [dnsext] Bigger QueryIDs,
Alex Bligh
Re: [dnsext] Bigger QueryIDs,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Re: [dnsext] Bigger QueryIDs,
Ted Lemon
Re: [dnsext] Bigger QueryIDs,
Edward Lewis
Re: [dnsext] Bigger QueryIDs,
Jeffrey A. Williams
[dnsext] Cookies, for bigger IDs (Was: Request for adoption,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Message not availableRE: Request for adoption (was: [dnsext] New draft has been posted),
Edward Lewis
Re: Request for adoption (was: [dnsext] New draft has been posted),
Samuel Weiler
[dnsext] blast from the past,
Paul Vixie
[dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-axfr-clarify-11,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-axfr-clarify-11.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-03 nits,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] HAHAHAHA...,
Nicholas Weaver
[dnsext] draft-wijngaards-dnsext-trust-history-02,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-12.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Evan Hunt
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Michael StJohns
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Michael StJohns
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Michael StJohns
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Chris Thompson
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Michael StJohns
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Edward Lewis
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] question on RFC 5011, section 2.4.3,
Edward Lewis
[dnsext] WGLC: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
Re: [dnsext] IANA considerations in the RSA-SHA2 draft,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] New Version Notification for draft-mcgrew-tss-02 (fwd),
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] Nearly there ...,
bmanning
[dnsext] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-bagnulo-behave-dns64-02.txt],
marcelo bagnulo braun
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-15.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Tony Finch
- [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Tim Chown
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Florian Weimer
- [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Andrew Sullivan
- [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Danny Mayer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Ask Bjørn Hansen
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Danny Mayer
- [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Jari Arkko
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Chris Thompson
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Edward Lewis
- RE: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Christian Huitema
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems,
Edward Lewis
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-03.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-02.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] Timeslot at IETF74?,
OndÅej SurÃ
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-11.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] [amorris@amsl.com: Initial Version I-D Submission Deadline Extended to March 4, 2009],
Andrew Sullivan
FW: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Aki Tuomi
[dnsext] enhanced WG pages at tools.ietf.org,
Alfred Hönes
Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Blog posts on DNSSEC,
Mark Andrews
[dnsext] Blog posts on DNSSEC,
Ben Laurie
[dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Ben Laurie
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Ralf Weber
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Ralf Weber
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root -- clarifying the distinctions between batch and real-time lookaside TARs,
Steve Crocker
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bmanning
- Message not available
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Paul Wouters
- Message not available
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bmanning
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bmanning
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bmanning
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Evan Hunt
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Evan Hunt
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bmanning
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bmanning
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Evan Hunt
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bmanning
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bmanning
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Evan Hunt
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Chris Thompson
- Re: [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Evan Hunt
- Message not available
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Daniel Kalchev
Message not available
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Chris Thompson
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bert hubert
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bmanning
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
bert hubert
- [dnsext] possible new uses for the DNS,
bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] possible new uses for the DNS,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] possible new uses for the DNS,
Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] possible new uses for the DNS,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] possible new uses for the DNS,
bmanning
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Ben Laurie
- Message not available
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Ben Laurie
- Message not available
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] [dnsext] Sidestepping the root,
Ben Laurie
[dnsext] type=ANY,
Edward Lewis
[dnsext] single-ton AXFRs, was Re: -10,
Edward Lewis
[dnsext] Unknown DNSKEY flags,
Alexd
[dnsext] expiry,
Edward Lewis
[dnsext] axfr-clarify-10 section 7, Zone Expiry Timer,
Andreas Gustafsson
[dnsext] axfr-clarify-10 and rapidly changing zones,
Andreas Gustafsson
[dnsext] RFC 5452 on Measures for Making DNS More Resilient against Forged Answers,
rfc-editor
[dnsext] axfr-clarify-10 section 3.2, Delegation Records,
Andreas Gustafsson
Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] Re: [DNSOP] SRV Protocol Label Registry,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-08,
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-08 - Setting of CD Bit,
Michael StJohns
[dnsext] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-08,
Paul Hoffman
[dnsext] More on RFC 5378,
Andrew Sullivan
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-08.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01.txt,
Edward Lewis
[dnsext] question on "SHA-2",
Edward Lewis
[dnsext] axfr-clarify-10 TSIG inconsistencies,
Andreas Gustafsson
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-10.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] another hornets nest,
Edward Lewis
Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
Alfred Hönes
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [dnsext] AXFR Clarify -- open issue w/ 'zone loading',
Alfred Hönes
[dnsext] DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Ray . Bellis
Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Danny Mayer
Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Ray . Bellis
Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Danny Mayer
Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Ralph Droms
Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Ralph Droms
[dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Ray . Bellis
Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Nicholas Weaver
- [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Ray . Bellis
- [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Ralph Droms
- [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] Re: DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines - draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01,
W.C.A. Wijngaards
[dnsext] signatures for HINFO RRsets,
Jelte Jansen
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[dnsext] A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Danny Mayer
- Re: [dnsext] A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Adam Langley
- [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeroen Massar
- [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeroen Massar
- [dnsext] SSL Certificate Fingerprint in DNS (Was: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS),
Jeroen Massar
- [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Adam Langley
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeroen Massar
- RE: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Danny Mayer
- [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Danny Mayer
- RE: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [dnsext] A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jelte Jansen
- [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeroen Massar
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeroen Massar
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Michael StJohns
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Michael StJohns
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Message not available
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Paul Vixie
Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
OndÅej SurÃ
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeroen Massar
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] What DNSSEC actually "secures?" (was: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS),
Thierry Moreau
- Re: [dnsext] What DNSSEC actually "secures?" (was: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS),
Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] What DNSSEC actually "secures?" (was: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS),
Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] What DNSSEC actually "secures?" (was: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS),
Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] What DNSSEC actually "secures?",
Thierry Moreau
- Re: [dnsext] What DNSSEC actually "secures?",
Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] What DNSSEC actually "secures?",
Thierry Moreau
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Nicholas Weaver
Re: [dnsext] Re: A custom DNS record for mandatory SSL/TLS,
Wes Hardaker
[dnsext] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-axfr-clarify-10.txt,
Internet-Drafts
Mail converted by MHonArc