[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dnsext] RSA/SHA2 new NSEC3 text proposal

At 15:56 +0000 12/17/08, Alex Bligh wrote:


Or are you arguing that in option 2 there should not even be a "SHOULD"
for servers?


Yeah, I suppose.
For a "general purpose implementation" I would use "RECOMMENDED" (that a server doing implementing RSA/SHA-2[56] also implement NSEC3). 
For a turn-key implementation why does RSA/SHA-2(56) depend on NSEC3?

I don't see a link between the two.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

Never confuse activity with progress.  Activity pays more.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>