[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dnsext] one algorithm number or two

At 8:59 +1100 12/12/08, Mark Andrews wrote:


	We can always go back and assign a NSEC only alias later
	if we end up seeing operational problems with the single
	assignment.
I have a hard time imagining the IETF effectively responding to an operational problem in a timely fashion.
The question is, how confident are we that NSEC3 is "perfect" and will not be supplanted by something else, in the same manner that NSEC3 has supplanted NSEC (in many people's eyes)? 
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

Never confuse activity with progress.  Activity pays more.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>