Re: implied NSEC3 support in rsasha256 (was: [dnsext] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-05)

[Scott Rose <scottr@nist.gov>]

On 12/10/08 2:11 PM, "Olaf Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl> wrote:
> My personal preference: Handle this in the WG, make sure we have
> hammered out all the issues and adapt a text. Then ask the AD for
> guidance on the next step.
> 
> 
> FWIW, I think that we are dealing with a fairly academic issue given
> that major TLDs move towards NSEC3 and any serious resolver will need
> to support NSEC3 for DNSSEC and therefore I support Jelte's text.
> 

I have read and support Jelte's text as well.  Failing that, I would
recommend going with Andrew's option 3.

Scott


> --Olaf

===================================
Scott Rose
NIST
scottr@nist.gov
ph: +1 301-975-8439
http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/dnssec
http://www.dnsops.gov/
===================================




--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>