Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS record

[Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>]

On Nov 25, 2008, at 14:45, Otmar Lendl wrote:

> For anything else, the name just doesn't fit.

I am painfully aware of this. :-) There would have been far less noise  
on this list if the template was for the FOO record. Too much emphasis  
has been placed on the proposed name, which has sparked a discussion  
that has nothing to do with the proposed RRtype's semantics. I  
inadvertedly picked a name that needlessly caused this. Sigh.

So can we pick some other name and stop obsessing about that? The name  
of the proposed RRtype does not matter.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>