Re: MUST for the implementation of for the operator? (Was: version -01 of draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-protocol-profile sent

[Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>]

On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 10:13:38PM +0100,
 Ralf Weber <denic@eng.colt.net> wrote 
 a message of 48 lines which said:

> >djbdns (http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/tcp.html). If we make a document for
> >implementors, a MUST here seems reasonable.

> AFAIR (it's been some time since I used it) djbdns only does zone
> transfers over DNS (and even these are strange sometimes), it does
> not answer normal DNS request via TCP.

That's not true and the Web page I mentioned explains why and how.
 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>