[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience-01.txt
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:48:09AM +0100,
Shane Kerr <Shane_Kerr@isc.org> wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
> I think this rationale makes sense. One thing I often find missing
> from RFCs is exactly this sort explanation.
+1 As long as the rationale is clearly separated from the normative
text (rationales and case studies tend to rot and to be not longer
relevant after a while).
> Maybe including it would be useful?
What do you think of my proposed text?
--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>