[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SO vs DNSSEC

To: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Subject: Re: SO vs DNSSEC
From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:48:31 +0100
Cc: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>, IETF DNSEXT WG <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:52:33 +0000
Envelope-to: namedroppers-data@psg.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:16:12AM -0500, Edward Lewis wrote:

> anyone been told to hold back on DNSSECbis because there are ongoing 
> discussions over NSEC3, etc.?   Are the distractions really 
> distracting or just providing an excuse?

I wouldn't be able to distinguish between the two. However, NSEC3 has, to my
experience, extended the perception that, "as usual", DNSSEC wil be ready
six months from now.

	Bert

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com      Open source, database driven DNS Software 
http://netherlabs.nl              Open and Closed source services

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Prev by Date: Re: SO vs DNSSEC
Next by Date: Re: brain cycles of the WG
Previous by thread: Re: SO vs DNSSEC
Next by thread: Re: SO vs DNSSEC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread