Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)

[bmanning@karoshi.com]

> 
> DNSSEC does take a water-tight approach to security, it would be able 
> to defend a lot of forms of attack and supports all of the robustness 
> principles of the DNS (caching, replication, etc.).  But is the 
> effort to be this secure worth the cost?  I haven't seen anyone who 
> says yes to the latter with an open wallet.
> -- 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468

	those w/ open wallets are now w/ empty wallets and nothing (much)
	to show for it.  :)

--bill

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>