[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)



On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:45:03AM +0100,
 Shane Kerr <Shane_Kerr@isc.org> wrote 
 a message of 38 lines which said:

> Isn't this always the case with security though? What is the direct,
> immediate RoI for putting a lock on your door?

You get a big cut in your insurance costs . That's a RoI!

[This could be a good model for DNSSEC. In the real world, decisions
about security are not taken based on technical merits. They are taken
based on what the insurance companies require.]

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>