Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft

[Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>]

On Wednesday 08 March 2006 02:04, Olaf M. Kolkman wrote:
> So in order to try and reach convergence --- which is incredibly  
> difficult --- Are there more takers for this position?

I'm perfectly happy with Paul's section instead of yours; I'm also perfectly 
happy with yours.

I don't think either one is "unprofessional."   The point is not to exclude 
"Thierry's proposal."   The point is to say what kind of IPR restrictions the 
working group is willing to accept on any protocol specification for a piece 
of technology that is be needed in some form or other in order for the whole 
protocol suite to be useful to users of the Internet: the people whom we 
ultimately serve when we do work for the IETF.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>