Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-02.txt

[David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>]

On Dec 16, 2005, at 9:19 AM, Edward Lewis wrote:

> I realize this doesn't answer the question "did the group?":
>
> Isn't everything subject to local policy?  (I think so.)
> For the sake of interoperability, is this important?  (I don't  
> think so.)
>
> Therefore I my opinion is that it should be SHOULD.  As in a  
> recommendation.

I agree.  This is a recommendation, not a requirement.

> At 13:41 -0500 12/14/05, Scott Rose wrote:
> > I think there is a typo in Section 3, second paragraph:
> >
> > "Validator implementations MUST, by default, ignore DS RRs  
> > containing SHA-1
> > digests if DS RRs with SHA-256 digests are present in the DS  
> > RRset.  THis
> > behavior SHOULD be the default."
> >
> > Did the group decide on MUST, or SHOULD?
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 
> =-=-=-=-
> Edward Lewis                                                 
> +1-571-434-5468
> NeuStar
>
> 3 months to the next trip.  I guess it's finally time to settle  
> down and
> find a grocery store.
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org  
> with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

--
David Blacka    <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
Sr. Engineer    VeriSign Applied Research




--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>