Re: private algorithms and the DS record

[Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>]

> Is there any  reason NOT to prepend the private alg. name to the DS
> hash?

I concur with Rob: this adds unnecessary ugliness to the DS RR, and is
likely a backwards-incompatible change.  I don't want to have to dust
off 3755 and wait for IANA again.

> Was the fact that the DS wasn't mentioned in the private algorithm
> appendix ON PURPOSE?

Concur with Scott and Rob: there was no particular consideration given
to private algorithms.  If there had been, I still doubt we would have
changed anything.

-- Sam


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>