Re: private algorithms and the DS record

["Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@ripe.net>]

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:20:26 -0500
David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com> wrote:

> For instance, we could modify the second sentence of the first paragraph 
>  of records-11, Appendix A.1.1 from:
> 
(...)


Hmmmm.... this hurts a bit. 

We have a choice;

- We send in a note to the RFC editor, now or during 48-hours; that is
  if the WG consents on this issue.  (this is a security bug that was
  not covered earlier).

- We let the RFCs be published and write a small I-D that updates the
  documents. 


Whatever we do we have a problem of deployed code not knowing of
this. I currently think the first choice is more elegant.

Please spend some time on reviewing this issue and its solution, it is
important enough!


-- Olaf


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>