[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EDNS0 numbers
>I can't find the registry either. (IANA, where are you?) But section
>7 of RFC2671 says:
>
> IESG approval should be required to create new entries in the EDNS
> Extended Label Type or EDNS Version Number registries, while any
> published RFC (including Informational, Experimental, or BCP)
> should be grounds for allocation of an EDNS Option Code.
>
>While very clear, this metric doesn't fall into any of the buckets in
>RFC2434. It sounds closest to "IETF Consensus" (or "IETF Review", as
>used by draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-01.txt), but one
>could argue that it was intended to be "Specification Required".
Thanks.
I plan to send an email to IANA requesting:
EDNS0 option code 1 for "Long-Lived Queries for DNS"
<http://files.dns-sd.org/draft-dns-llq.txt>, and
EDNS0 option code 2 for "Dynamic DNS Update Leases"
<http://files.dns-sd.org/draft-dns-update-leases.txt>.
Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
* Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Computer, Inc.
* www.stuartcheshire.org
--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>