[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: EDNS0 numbers



>I can't find the registry either.  (IANA, where are you?)  But section
>7 of RFC2671 says:
>
>     IESG approval should be required to create new entries in the EDNS
>     Extended Label Type or EDNS Version Number registries, while any
>     published RFC (including Informational, Experimental, or BCP)
>     should be grounds for allocation of an EDNS Option Code.
>
>While very clear, this metric doesn't fall into any of the buckets in
>RFC2434.  It sounds closest to "IETF Consensus" (or "IETF Review", as
>used by draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-01.txt), but one
>could argue that it was intended to be "Specification Required".

Thanks.

I plan to send an email to IANA requesting:

EDNS0 option code 1 for "Long-Lived Queries for DNS"
<http://files.dns-sd.org/draft-dns-llq.txt>, and

EDNS0 option code 2 for "Dynamic DNS Update Leases"
<http://files.dns-sd.org/draft-dns-update-leases.txt>.

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
 * Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Computer, Inc.
 * www.stuartcheshire.org


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>