[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fw: Approval to Post Version -00 Internet-Drafts for the 61st IETF Meeting in Washington, DC, USA

At 11:07 27/09/2004, Mike StJohns wrote:
Is there agreement to accept http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stjohns-dnssec-trustupdate-01.txt "Automated Updates of DNSSEC Trust Anchors" as a WG draft? If so, I'll repost it as draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-trustupdate-00.txt.

Does anyone in the working group object that we admit the this document and
the Threshold key validation schema described in
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ihren-dnsext-threshold-validation-01.txt? 


It was the sense of the room in San Diego to admit these documents
as working group items, but we chairs forgot to officially ask this
question on the mailing list.

The reason to do this work in DNSEXT is that one or both these
proposals want to use bits in the DNSKEY record for signaling of
state change(s).

        Olafur DNSEXT co-chair


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>