[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: zone-covering NSEC ranges -- "which is it?"

To: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: zone-covering NSEC ranges -- "which is it?"
From: Roy Badami <roy@gnomon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:50:32 +0100
Cc: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20040615103704.678a2dfc.olaf@ripe.net>
References: <20040614210836.CE67A13971@sa.vix.com> <20040615103704.678a2dfc.olaf@ripe.net>

>>>>> "Olaf" == Olaf M Kolkman <olaf@ripe.net> writes:

    Olaf> The mention of circularity is unambiguously mentioned in
    Olaf> records 4.1.1.

    Olaf>    The value of the Next Domain Name field in the last NSEC
    Olaf> record in the zone is the name of the zone apex

I disagree that it is unambiguous.  It is perfectly possible to read
the above paragraph as indicating that the last NSEC record in the
zone is a special case.

     -roy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: zone-covering NSEC ranges -- "which is it?"
  - From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
- Re: zone-covering NSEC ranges -- "which is it?"
  - From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@ripe.net>

References:
- zone-covering NSEC ranges -- "which is it?"
  - From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: zone-covering NSEC ranges -- "which is it?"
  - From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@ripe.net>

Prev by Date: Re: zone-covering NSEC ranges -- "which is it?"
Next by Date: Re: DNSKEY flags field
Previous by thread: Re: zone-covering NSEC ranges -- "which is it?"
Next by thread: Re: zone-covering NSEC ranges -- "which is it?"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread