[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DNSSECbis last call workshop -- summary

At 10:35 2004-01-23, Suzanne Woolf wrote:

 [ Moderators note: Post by non-subscriber.  With the massive amount of
   spam, it is easy to miss and therefore delete relevant posts
   by non-subsrcibers. Please fix your subscription addresses. ]


Greetings,

As noted to the list, a "DNSSECbis last call" workshop was sponsored
this week in Amsterdam by NLnet Labs, ISC, and RIPE NCC. Activities
included testing of DNSSEC features in two independent authoritative
server implementations and detailed analysis and discussion of the
current DNSSEC protocol draft
(draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-protocol-04.txt).



In summary, however, the issues identified were weaknesses in the
documents, not significant problems with the specification. The
workshop result was that the protocol is functionally complete. At
risk of speaking for others, it seems that when the documents are
revised to address the concerns raised, participants will be ready to
support advancing them to the IESG.


On behalf of the working group, I would like to thank RIPE NCC for
hosting this workshop and all the participants for their valuable
contributions of time and effort.

The outcome of this workshop is a proof that we are finally close to
having good DNSSECbis documents as well as two working DNSSEC
implementations.

Many of the nits raised in the WS and on the mailing lists,
have already been addressed in the working versions of the documents.
DNSSECbis WGLC formally ends today but keep the comments coming.

Olafur DNSEXT co-chair.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>