Re: comment on "DNSSEC Operational Practices" Term

[bmanning@karoshi.com]

> 
> There is one disagreement between the DNSSEC Operational Practices draft and
> the DNSSECbis Protocol draft.  That is how to classify and handle "BAD" RR
> sets in responses.
> 
> The Appendix in the operational draft states that "BAD data is not cached."
> However, the proto doc states that a resolver may want to have a "BAD" data
> cache for various reasons.  Under normal circumstances, a resolver will not
> want to cache proven BAD data (however you want to define BAD), but there
> are cases where it might be useful for the resolver to have a BAD data
> cache.

	the protocol draft has it right.

--bill

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>