--On Tuesday, December 10, 2002 08:05:01 +0000 "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> wrote: > My recommended use of rsync is to replicate complete _servers_. This has > a simple meaning: the servers respond identically to every query. A cool concept. And a fringe case at best. I am hard pressed to find this situation in large and/or widespread management domains -- most servers are by intention or legacy somewhat unique. This also is an operational issue. > What you're trying to do is replicate separate _zones_. This is a much > more complicated concept. Contrary to your previous claims, it does > _not_ mean that the servers respond identically to every query in the > zone; I explained in a previous message why that can't be true. So why are you attacking the AXFR concept by proposing something completely different, that does not fill the same need? -- Måns Nilsson Systems Specialist +46 70 681 7204 KTHNOC MN1334-RIPE We're sysadmins. To us, data is a protocol-overhead.
Attachment:
pgp00004.pgp
Description: PGP signature