[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: it appears that this whole "ask for AAAA before A" will be painful

To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: it appears that this whole "ask for AAAA before A" will be painful
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 14:12:23 +0900
In-reply-to: bmanning's message of Sun, 08 Dec 2002 20:25:36 PST. <200212090425.gB94Pac09995@boreas.isi.edu>

>% do we need a BCP draft recommending that SERVFAIL be ignored, in case it came
>% from a load balancer?  or shall we call the load balancers faulty, and let
>% web sites like united.com be stranded in the new IPv6 era?

	draft-itojun-jinmei-ipv6-issues-00.txt section 4.4 talks about the
	problem.  i'm not too sure how to make this document progress, but
	anyways, it's a start.  time for rfc1912bis?

itojun

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

References:
- Re: it appears that this whole "ask for AAAA before A" will be painful
  - From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: in support of axfr-clarify
Next by Date: rsync vs. axfr-clarify (was: in support of axfr-clarify)
Previous by thread: Re: it appears that this whole "ask for AAAA before A" will be painful
Next by thread: Re: it appears that this whole "ask for AAAA before A" will be painful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread