[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: in support of axfr-clarify
[ post by non-subscriber. with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers. if you wish to regularly
post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
automatically accepted. ]
> > Is your pretense of independence part of the BIND company's
> > strategy for packing this standards committee,
> > -- sez djb
>
> Do you have any proof that "the BIND company" (who is this, exactly?) is
> "packing this standards committee"? If so, present it. Otherwise admit
> that you are the liar and send a retraction.
>
> Disgusted,
> -drc
More humourous, perhaps, is the delusion that a mailing list
is a masquerade for a standards committee.
Dun & Bradstreet do not appear to have a listing for any company
named "BIND" that has DNS software as a product. Perhaps
the "DJBDNS company" representative is playing fast and loose
with pejoritive statements to attempt to incite non-productive
dialog?
I expect that a more productive tactic would be for the "DJBDNS
company" representative to write an ID to debate/discuss the
relative merits of the existing ID under discussion and propose substantive
alternatives that are more inclusive and advance the state of art
of the Domain Name System. Promotion of better ideas works lots
better than castigation of ideas that are distastful, for what
ever reason.
As for me, I want a strong, robust, evolving system that has "genetic"
diversity in the code base.
--bill
--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>