Re: axfr-clarify supporting unauthorized users

["D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>]

[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
  and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers.  your subscription address is
  54830374684695-namedroppers@sublist.cr.yp.to, please post from it or, if you
  wish to regularly post from an address that is not subscribed to this
  mailing list, send a message to namedroppers-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to
  have the alternate address added to the list of addresses from which
  submissions are automatically accepted. ]

Mark.Andrews@isc.org writes:
> Dan I asked you a reasonable question with reasonable pre-conditions.

No, you didn't. Your preconditions contradict themselves. You start from
the silly assumption that an unauthorized user, a user to whom the
primary refuses to give the zone, can nevertheless be a secondary, and
then you complain that the primary isn't doing what you think it's
supposed to be doing for a secondary.

Maybe your implementation has some sort of ``unauthorized users who we
call secondaries even though they're not'' list, but there's nothing in
the protocol requiring this.

---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,
Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago



--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>