Re: trying to sweep namedroppers mismanagement under the rug

["Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk@cisco.com>]

[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
  and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers.  if you wish to regularly
  post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
  message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
  address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
  automatically accepted. ]

Thus spake "Dean Anderson" <dean@av8.com>
> I would agree the problem is solved if Bush adds the proper addresses to
> the approved subscribers list, as publicly requested.
>
> But since it has taken so much discussion to arrive at that solution (and
> I'm not sure we have yet), list management is clearly a problem, and has
> been a chronic problem.

List management is not a problem; there is a policy statement and it is
followed.  If individuals refuse to follow the documented process because
they wish to be a martyr, that is not the IETF's or IESG's problem.

If someone has a problem with the process, that needs to be directed at the
IESG in a general form, not as a personal attack against a list maintainer
as long as said maintainer is following the IESG's policy.

S




--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>