[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: trying to sweep namedroppers mismanagement under the rug
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Dean Anderson wrote:
> I would agree the problem is solved if Bush adds the proper addresses to
> the approved subscribers list, as publicly requested.
>
> But since it has taken so much discussion to arrive at that solution (and
> I'm not sure we have yet), list management is clearly a problem, and has
> been a chronic problem.
urm... if you read back, you'll find that a number of people have been
suggesting this very solution (ie, Bernstein should ask to have his
preferred posting address added to an allow-posters list) for a number of
days now. The fact that Bernstein felt that he had to ignore all of these
and continue on ancient history until Bush spelled it out for him[1] would
tend to indicate a lack of Common Sense on Bernstein's part.
Next topic.
--==--
Bruce.
[1] One would think that something is up when most of one's posts from
16th of March 2002 have all been labeled with something like '[post
from non-subscriber]' when they get forwarded to a mailing list,
particularly when one has publically complained about mailing list
software and written one's own.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>