Re: in support of axfr-clarify

[Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>]

>   Paul> ... this is just false, and is indicative of other conceptual errors.
> 
>   I agree strongly with you on this - delegations belong to the child.
> 
>   What about DS? The problems identified at the workshop stem PRECISELY from
> the problems with who is authoritative for the DS record. 

yes.  i've got most of a fix ready to propose.  DS as it stands won't work.

> A hack was proposed, whereby the DS record for example.com would be
> actually named as _ds_example.com. This restores the principle that you
> outline above. it would be very nice if we could come up with a solution
> to the DS problem doesn't violate this principal.

agreed.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>