Re: in support of axfr-clarify

[Jim Reid <Jim.Reid@nominum.com>]

>>>>> "djb" == D J Bernstein <djb@cr.yp.to> writes:

    djb> RFC 1034 says that the AXFR server sends ``messages'' that
    djb> ``carry'' all the records. This is ambiguous

I'm perplexed. You accept RFC1034 is ambiguous on the subject of zone
transfers. Fine. So why are you objecting to a draft which clarifies the
specification and eliminates that ambiguity?

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>