Re: in support of axfr-clarify

[Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>]

On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 16:32, Dean Anderson wrote:
> It seems highly inappropriate to make seemingly gratiutous changes in a
> particular commercial product, begin distributing those changes to users,
> and then attempt to change the standards to reflect the changes, and
> describing those changes as a "clarification".

Would it really make any of you happier if the title were changed from
"clarifications" to "revisions" and the introductory text modified
accordingly?  (If so, I'm all for it.)


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>