Re: Mail-Transmitter RR

["Al Costanzo" <al@akc.com>]

Sorry,

IMHO it breaks nothing. It is not a required RR it is a suggested one. If
you cant SPAM in your mailbox fine, for those of us who do not it is an
excellent idea.

-al
----- Original Message -----
From: "Måns Nilsson" <mansaxel@sunet.se>
To: <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: Mail-Transmitter RR


>
>
> --On Sunday, June 02, 2002 05:04:24 -0700 "Andy W. Barclay"
> <abarclay@unixpeople.com> wrote:
>
> > This is no different from the way 90% of the population of the Internet
> > does things now.
>
> Perhaps 90% of the people on the Internet use Windows. Are you suggesting
> we  should force everyone to use Windows just because 90% of the people on
> the Internet do so?
>
> The proposal(s) break(s) e-mail in fundamental and worrying ways, and make
> the probability of e-mail delivery in adverse conditions much lower (think
> backhoe incident on main internet connectivity, trigging the use of dialup
> for backup connectivity, and nobody remembering to add that netblock to
the
> good, allowed ones).
>
> Us moderately and above clued people should not destroy the "survive-all"
> capabilities of the Internet. There are others doing that much better.
>
> This is a bad suggestion, and it needs to be stopped.
>
> /Måns, who has a sendmail running on his laptop.
> --
> Måns Nilsson            Systems Specialist
> +46 70 681 7204         KTHNOC  MN1334-RIPE
>
> We're sysadmins. To us, data is a protocol-overhead.
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>