[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: mdns-08 draft

To: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Subject: Re: mdns-08 draft
From: Erik Guttman <erikg@germany.sun.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 15:13:34 +0100 (MET)
Cc: Erik Guttman <erik.guttman@Sun.COM>, Levon Esibov <levone@windows.microsoft.com>, cheshire@apple.com, Dave Thaler <DTHALER@windows.microsoft.com>, sra@hactrn.net, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112211442070.46681-100000@internaut.com>

On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> > > How about this?
> > > 
> > > "A host configured to not be a responder SHOULD NOT be a "sender". While
> > s/SHOULD NOT/SHOULD
> 
> What are we trying to say here? That senders SHOULD be responders
> too? Or that a sender MAY NOT be a responder? 

The double negative confused me.  
How about 'Senders SHOULD be Responders, too.'
Even this is a bit preachy, IMO.

Erik

to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.

Prev by Date: list policy
Next by Date: DS design questions
Previous by thread: list policy
Next by thread: DS design questions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread