Re: reverse delegation under ip6.arpa.?

[JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L@C#:H(B <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>]

[ last post i will approve on the subject.  please take it to dnsop and
  ngtrans -- randy

>>>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:14:24 -0500, 
>>>>> "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com> said:

>> I'd also like to know the current policy on this.  The current status
>> is really confusing and can be a serious barrier to deploy IPv6.
>> 
>> Honestly, if we are allowed to live with the current spec
>> (i.e. ip6.int. with the nibble format), I'll be really happy.
>> However, the transition to ip6.arpa is inevitable, we should be ready
>> for this as soon as possible, both in operation and in implementation.

> See RFC 3152, aka BCP 49.

I should have been clearer in the previous message...I know the RFC,
so my question is

  does the RFC force us to obsolete ip6.arpa and migrate to ip6.arpa.?
  and
  is this the only way to go?

I'm not making an objection, I'm just asking.  If the answer is yes,
I'm just okay with it.

					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp


to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.